Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
S
Slurm
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
tud-zih-energy
Slurm
Commits
75186592
Commit
75186592
authored
13 years ago
by
Morris Jette
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Clarify use of QOS NoReserve flag in documentation
parent
e0890cd9
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/man/man1/sacctmgr.1
+6
-6
6 additions, 6 deletions
doc/man/man1/sacctmgr.1
with
6 additions
and
6 deletions
doc/man/man1/sacctmgr.1
+
6
−
6
View file @
75186592
...
@@ -914,12 +914,12 @@ any jobs submitted with this QOS that fall below the UsageThreshold
...
@@ -914,12 +914,12 @@ any jobs submitted with this QOS that fall below the UsageThreshold
will be held until their Fairshare Usage goes above the Threshold.
will be held until their Fairshare Usage goes above the Threshold.
.TP
.TP
\fINoReserve\fP
\fINoReserve\fP
If set
,
and
using
backfill, jobs using this QOS will
all be considered
If
this flag is
set and backfill
scheduling is used
, jobs using this QOS will
at the same level within this QOS meaning if a larger, higher priority
not reserve resources in the backfill schedule's map of resources allocated
job is unable to run a smaller job will run if possible even if the
through time. This flag is intended for use with a QOS that may be preempted
larger higher priority job will be delayed starting.
by jobs associated with all other QOS (e.g use with a "standby" QOS). If the
NOTE: This could cause starvation on these larger jobs, but if that
i
s
allocated is used with a QOS which can not be preempted by all other QOS,
i
t
ok, this flag most likely will increase utilization
.
could result in starvation of larger jobs
.
.TP
.TP
\fIPartitionMaxNodes\fP
\fIPartitionMaxNodes\fP
If set jobs using this QOS will be able to
If set jobs using this QOS will be able to
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment