Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 54091250 authored by Moe Jette's avatar Moe Jette
Browse files

Clarify resource allocation bug

parent 42d0c3a3
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -14,13 +14,15 @@ documents those changes that are of interest to users and admins. ...@@ -14,13 +14,15 @@ documents those changes that are of interest to users and admins.
-- For Moab, sbatch --get-user-env option processed by slurmd daemon -- For Moab, sbatch --get-user-env option processed by slurmd daemon
rather than the sbatch command itself to permit faster response rather than the sbatch command itself to permit faster response
for Moab. for Moab.
-- We are not saving a pending job's task distribution, so after restarting -- IMPORTANT FIX: This only effects use of select/cons_res when allocating
resources by core or socket, not by nodes or processors (the default).
We are not saving a pending job's task distribution, so after restarting
slurmctld, select/cons_res was over-allocating resources based upon an slurmctld, select/cons_res was over-allocating resources based upon an
invalid task distribution value. Since we can't save the value without invalid task distribution value. Since we can't save the value without
changing the state save file format, we'll just set it to the default changing the state save file format, we'll just set it to the default
value for now. This may result in a slight variation on how sockets value for now and save it in Slurm v1.4. This may result in a slight
and cores are allocated to jobs, but at least resources will not be variation on how sockets and cores are allocated to jobs, but at least
over-allocated. resources will not be over-allocated.
* Changes in SLURM 1.3.3 * Changes in SLURM 1.3.3
======================== ========================
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment